Hi Biju, On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 7:49 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The host_node pointer assigned and freed in adv7533_parse_dt() > and later adv7533_attach_dsi() uses the same. Fix this issue > by freeing the host_node in adv7533_attach_dsi() instead of > adv7533_parse_dt(). > > Fixes: 1e4d58cd7f88 ("drm/bridge: adv7533: Create a MIPI DSI device") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v3: > - Replace __free construct with readable of_node_put(). > Changes in v2: > - Added the tag "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" in the sign-off area. > - Dropped Archit Taneja invalid Mail address Thanks for the update! > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7533.c > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ int adv7533_attach_dsi(struct adv7511 *adv) > }; > > host = of_find_mipi_dsi_host_by_node(adv->host_node); > + of_node_put(adv->host_node); This still looks fragile to me, as afterwards a pointer to a freed node is left in struct adv7511.host_node. It would be safer to also clear adv->host_node here. However, taking a look from a distance, the code looks like: static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c) { ... adv7533_parse_dt(dev->of_node, adv7511); ... if (adv7511->info->has_dsi) ret = adv7533_attach_dsi(adv7511); ... } The only reason adv7511.host_node exists is to pass it from adv7533_parse_dt() to adv7533_attach_dsi(). So what about making this explicit? 1. Let adv7533_parse_dt() return the host_node or an error pointer, 2. Pass the host_node as a parameter to adv7533_attach_dsi(), 3. Call of_node_put() in adv7511_probe() after use. > if (!host) > return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, > "failed to find dsi host\n"); > @@ -181,8 +182,6 @@ int adv7533_parse_dt(struct device_node *np, struct adv7511 *adv) > if (!adv->host_node) > return -ENODEV; > > - of_node_put(adv->host_node); > - > adv->use_timing_gen = !of_property_read_bool(np, > "adi,disable-timing-generator"); Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds