On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 10:18:06AM +0000, Matt Coster wrote: > On 05/11/2024 18:06, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:58:10PM +0000, Matt Coster wrote: > >> This attribute will be required for the BXS-4-64 MC1 and will be enabled in > >> the DTS for the TI k3-j721s2 in a subsequent patch; add it now so > >> dtbs_check doesn't complain later. > > > > Sounds like the property should be made required for that integration. > > This is something I went back and forth on. Where is the line drawn > between things that should be enforced in bindings and things that only > ever need to be specified once, so should just be left to the dt itself > to be the source of truth? > > Having said that, I realise TI could spin a new SoC with a new dt but > use the same compatible string for the GPU; No they can't. New SoC, new compatible. > the "single" source of truth > then wouldn't be so single anymore. I guess by making this property > required for this compatible string, we're saying any use of it must > behave in exactly the same way, right?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
