On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:41:31PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Describe the most conservative version of the driver implementations. > All drivers should support this. > > Many drivers support extending the range if a large page is hit, but > let's not make that officially approved API. The main point is to > document explicitly that split is not supported. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > index 83c8e617a2c588..d3cf7cc69c797c 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > @@ -2586,6 +2586,20 @@ static size_t __iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, > return unmapped; > } > > +/** > + * iommu_unmap() - Remove mappings from a range of IOVA > + * @domain: Domain to manipulate > + * @iova: IO virtual address to start > + * @len: Length of the range starting from @iova > + * > + * iommu_unmap() will remove a translation created by iommu_map(). It cannot > + * subdivide a mapping created by iommu_map(), so it should be called with IOVA > + * ranges that match what was passed to iommu_map(). The range can aggregate > + * contiguous iommu_map() calls so long as no individual range is split. > + * > + * Returns: Number of bytes of IOVA unmapped. iova + res will be the point > + * unmapping stopped. I guess 'res' is the return value here. Not my default name for the variable, worth replacing it with "return value" ? Regardless of the acceptance of this nit: Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx> Best regards, Liviu > + */ > size_t iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, > unsigned long iova, size_t size) > { > -- > 2.43.0 > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯