On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:07:42AM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:07:58AM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 11:52:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 02:46:31PM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > > > > > I will give this a try with i915 and/or xe. > > > > > > Less horrible version here: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/pmu-unregister > > > > > > I've just pushed it out to the robots, but it builds, passes perf test > > > and your dummy_pmu testcase (for me, on my one testbox and .config > > > etc..) > > > > It passed for me as well with both dummy_pmu and with i915. I have some > > changes to igt (i915/xe testsuite) that should bring some more coverage. > > I minimized the pending test changes I had and posted to trigger CI: > > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/140355/ > > Our CI also didn't trigger that pmu issue and the test could run > succesfully. Excellent. > I did get a report from kernel test robot though: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202410281436.8246527d-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ Yeah, I think I fixed that one, but the robot gifted me another one that I still need to find time to address. I'm hoping this weel. I'll repost properly once I fix it. Thanks!
