On 2024-10-23 23:50, Kasireddy, Vivek wrote: >> I'd echo many of Bjorn's concerns. In addition, I think the name of the >> pci_devs_are_p2pdma_compatible() isn't quite right. Specifically this is >> dealing with PCI functions within a single device that are known to >> allow P2P traffic. So I think the name should probably reflect that. > Would pci_devfns_support_p2pdma() be a more appropriate name? That sounds better to me, thanks. Logan
