Re: [PATCH v3 12/15] drm/bridge: Add ITE IT6263 LVDS to HDMI converter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:10:51PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> On 10/22/2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:36:47PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> >> Hi Maxime,
> >>
> >> On 10/21/2024, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 02:44:43PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> >>>> +static int it6263_bridge_atomic_check(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >>>> +				      struct drm_bridge_state *bridge_state,
> >>>> +				      struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >>>> +				      struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
> >>>> +	int ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	ret = drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_check(conn_state->connector,
> >>>> +						     conn_state->state);
> >>>> +	if (ret)
> >>>> +		return ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	return mode->clock > MAX_PIXEL_CLOCK_KHZ ? -EINVAL : 0;
> >>>
> >>> drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_check will already make that check, so
> >>> it's redundant.
> >>
> >> MAX_PIXEL_CLOCK_KHZ is 150MHz. With 150MHz pixel clock rate, we'll get
> >> 150MHz HDMI character rate for 8bpc and 187.5MHz HDMI character rate
> >> for 10bpc, both are lower than MAX_HDMI_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_HZ = 225MHz.
> > 
> > I guess? I have no idea how that's relevant though. Where are those
> > constraints coming from, and why aren't you checking for them in
> > tmds_char_rate_valid?
> 
> All constraints come from IT6263 data sheet. They are also mentioned
> in IT6263 product link(commit message contains the link).
> 
> https://www.ite.com.tw/en/product/cate1/IT6263
> 
> "
> LVDS RX
> Support input clock rate up to 150 MHz
> 
> HDMI TX
> Support link speeds of up to 2.25 Gbps (link clock rate of 225 MHz) 
> "
> 
> If no objection, I'll check mode clock rate against
> MAX_PIXEL_CLOCK_KHZ in tmds_char_rate_valid.

If you don't support bpc other than 8, and no other format than RGB,
then it's a good enough approximation.

It should be documented though

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux