On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 10:12 -0700, Boqun Feng wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 08:17:50AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote: > [...] > > > > > > So even though first_lock_dep_map is a fake lock, it has to have > > > the > > > same wait types as a real mutex. > > > > Understood. > > > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > Yes it does. I'll update to a v3, and add a Tested-by: tag. Would > > you > > I think you should send a v3 then after I test, I will send my > Tested-by. > > > like a Co-developed-by: tag as well? > > It's not a big change onto yours, but feel free to add it. It would probably have taken me considerable time to find that missing LD_WAIT_SLEEP, but I forgot to ask for your S-O-B so I sent the patch without. Perhaps can be added at commit time if needed. Thanks again, Thomas > > Regards, > Boqun > > > > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > > > > [...]
