On 14/10/2024 18:59, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:54 AM Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With the suggestions from Alice Ryhl to not introduce a return, and use
expect:
+1 to both.
`expect` (here and the other ones I suggested) require `rust-next`, so
if this goes through DRM, then we can clean this up later. Otherwise,
if you prefer `rust-next`, we can change them to `expect` already.
I don't plan to touch drm_panic_qr.rs, so I think it's better if this
series goes through rust-next, to avoid an extra cleanup step later.
--
Jocelyn
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
