On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 04:13:01PM GMT, Dave Stevenson wrote: > Hi Maíra > > On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 15:12, Maíra Canal <mcanal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > VC4 has two relevant mailing list: kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and > > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Therefore, list those two mailing > > lists in the VC4 section. > > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is automatically picked up by > get_maintainer.pl due to vc4 living under /drivers/gpu/drm. Likewise > the DT bindings are covered. AIUI that means we don't need to list it > explicitly. > > > Actually, Raspberry Pi Kernel Maintenance <kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > was already listed in the VC4 section, but it was listed as a reviewer. > > List it as a mailing list. > > I had this debate with Maxime in v1 when I added this [1]. > It's not an open list as most L: entries are. The top of MAINTAINERS > lists as "L: *Mailing list* that is relevant to this area". That > mailing list is dri-devel. > You also get "Broadcom internal kernel review list > <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" listed as R: in various > MAINTAINERS entries. > > I don't know the definitive answer here, but it seemed to fit reasonably as R:. Yeah, I told you last time, it's going to be a recurring discussion because it's super unusual :) Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
