On 10/9/24 17:03, Jani Nikula wrote: > It's client_name_lock, not name_lock. Also unify style while at it. > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241009172650.29169e6f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 56c594d8df64 ("drm: add DRM_SET_CLIENT_NAME ioctl") > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/drm/drm_file.h | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h > index d4f1c115ea0f..f0ef32e9fa5e 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h > @@ -395,7 +395,10 @@ struct drm_file { > * Userspace-provided name; useful for accounting and debugging. > */ > const char *client_name; > - /** @name_lock: Protects @client_name. */ > + > + /** > + * @client_name_lock: Protects @client_name. > + */ > struct mutex client_name_lock; > }; Thanks for the quick fix! Please apply to misc-next Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Best regards, Dmitry
