On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:30:40AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 07.10.24 um 18:35 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König: > > After commit 0edb555a65d1 ("platform: Make platform_driver::remove() > > return void") .remove() is (again) the right callback to implement for > > platform drivers. > > > > Convert all platform drivers below drivers/dma after the previous > > conversion commits apart from the wireless drivers to use .remove(), > > with the eventual goal to drop struct platform_driver::remove_new(). As > > .remove() and .remove_new() have the same prototypes, conversion is done > > by just changing the structure member name in the driver initializer. > > This paragraph refers to dma and wireless code. I don't understand how that > is related. Ah, too many patches and missing automation in some parts. @Helge, can you replace this paragraph by: Convert all platform drivers below drivers/video/fbdev to use .remove(), with the eventual goal to drop struct platform_driver::remove_new(). As .remove() and .remove_new() have the same prototypes, conversion is done by just changing the structure member name in the driver initializer. ? Or should I resend? Thanks for noticing, Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature