On 10/4/24 03:15, Sundararaju, Sathishkumar wrote:
All occurrences of this error fix should have been together in a single patch both in _get and _set callbacks corresponding to f0b19b84d391, please avoid separate patch for each occurrence. Sorry Alex, I missed to note this yesterday. Regards, Sathish
Sathish, Please don't post on top when responding to kernel emails and patches. It makes it difficult to follow the discussions
On 10/4/2024 1:46 PM, Advait Dhamorikar wrote:Fix shift-count-overflow when creating mask. The expression's value may not be what the programmer intended, because the expression is evaluated using a narrower integer type. Fixes: f0b19b84d391 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_jpeg_sched_mask debugfs") Signed-off-by: Advait Dhamorikar<advaitdhamorikar@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c index 95e2796919fc..7df402c45f40 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_jpeg_sched_mask_get(void *data, u64 *val) for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) { ring = &adev->jpeg.inst[i].ring_dec[j]; if (ring->sched.ready) - mask |= 1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j); + mask |= (u64)1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j); } } *val = mask;
thanks, -- Shuah
