Applied. Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 6:53 AM Sundararaju, Sathishkumar
<sasundar@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> The patch is Reviewed-by: Sathishkumar S <sathishkumar.sundararaju@xxxxxxx>
>
> Regards,
> Sathish
>
>
> On 10/3/2024 3:56 PM, Advait Dhamorikar wrote:
> > Fix shift-count-overflow in JPEG instance
> > multiplication. The expression's value may not be
> > what the programmer intended, because the expression
> > is evaluated using a narrower integer type.
> >
> > Fixes: f0b19b84d391 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_jpeg_sched_mask debugfs")
> > Signed-off-by: Advait Dhamorikar <advaitdhamorikar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V1 -> V2: addressed review comments
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
> > index 95e2796919fc..b6f0435f56ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
> > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_jpeg_sched_mask_set(void *data, u64 val)
> > if (!adev)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > - mask = (1 << (adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_inst * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings)) - 1;
> > + mask = ((uint64_t)1 << (adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_inst * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings)) - 1;
> > if ((val & mask) == 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
