Re: [PATCH v3] drm/qxl: Add drm_panic support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 21/09/2024 à 06:33, Ryosuke Yasuoka a écrit :
QXL supports the drm_panic module, which displays a message to the
screen when a kernel panic occurs.

Signed-off-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Hi,

a few comments/nitpicks below, if of interest.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
index d6ea01f3797b..a3dd2ed4d9c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_cmd.c
@@ -174,6 +174,35 @@ static bool qxl_ring_pop(struct qxl_ring *ring,
  	return true;
  }
+/* For drm panic */
+int
+qxl_push_command_ring_without_release(struct qxl_device *qdev,
+				      struct qxl_bo *bo, uint32_t offset)
+{
+	struct qxl_command cmd;
+	struct qxl_ring *ring = qdev->command_ring;
+	struct qxl_ring_header *header = &(ring->ring->header);

Nitpick: I think that these () can be removed.

+	uint8_t *elt;
+	int idx;
+
+	cmd.type = QXL_CMD_DRAW;
+	cmd.data = qxl_bo_physical_address(qdev, bo, offset);
+
+	idx = header->prod & (ring->n_elements - 1);
+	elt = ring->ring->elements + idx * ring->element_size;
+
+	memcpy((void *)elt, &cmd, ring->element_size);
+
+	header->prod++;
+
+	mb();
+
+	if (header->prod == header->notify_on_prod)
+		outb(0, ring->prod_notify);
+
+	return 0;
+}

...

+int qxl_push_command_ring_without_release(struct qxl_device *qdev,
+					  struct qxl_bo *bo, uint32_t offset);
+
+

Nitpick: no need for 2 empty lines.

  int
  qxl_push_command_ring_release(struct qxl_device *qdev, struct qxl_release *release,
  			      uint32_t type, bool interruptible);

...

+int
+qxl_image_alloc_objects_without_release(struct qxl_device *qdev,
+					struct qxl_drm_image *image,
+					struct qxl_drm_chunk *chunk,
+					struct qxl_bo *image_bo, struct qxl_bo *chunk_bo,
+					uint8_t *surface_base, int width, int height,
+					int depth, int stride)
+{
+	int ret;
+	unsigned int chunk_size = sizeof(struct qxl_data_chunk) + stride * height;
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&image->chunk_list);
+	qxl_panic_bo_create(qdev, sizeof(struct qxl_image), image_bo);
+	image->bo = image_bo;
+
+	qxl_panic_bo_create(qdev, chunk_size, chunk_bo);
+	chunk->bo = chunk_bo;
+	list_add_tail(&chunk->head, &image->chunk_list);
+
+	ret = qxl_image_init(qdev, NULL, image, surface_base,
+			     0, 0, width, height, depth, stride);
+	return ret;
+

Nitpick: unneeeded empty line.

+}
+
  int
  qxl_image_alloc_objects(struct qxl_device *qdev,
  			struct qxl_release *release,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c
index 66635c55cf85..cdba20718674 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c
@@ -29,6 +29,16 @@
  #include "qxl_drv.h"
  #include "qxl_object.h"
+/* For drm panic */
+static void qxl_panic_ttm_bo_destroy(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo)
+{
+	struct qxl_bo *bo;
+
+	bo = to_qxl_bo(tbo);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->map_count > 0);
+	drm_gem_object_release(&bo->tbo.base);
+}
+
  static void qxl_ttm_bo_destroy(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo)
  {
  	struct qxl_bo *bo;
@@ -101,6 +111,42 @@ static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs qxl_object_funcs = {
  	.print_info = drm_gem_ttm_print_info,
  };
+/* For drm panic */
+int qxl_panic_bo_create(struct qxl_device *qdev, unsigned long size, struct qxl_bo *bo)

This function is used 3 times in this patch. Its returned value is never checked. Should some error handling be removed, or maybe change this function to return void?

+{
+	u32 domain = QXL_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
+	struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { true, false };
+	enum ttm_bo_type type;
+	int r;
+
+	type = ttm_bo_type_device;
+
+	size = roundup(size, PAGE_SIZE);
+	r = drm_gem_object_init(&qdev->ddev, &bo->tbo.base, size);
+	if (unlikely(r))
+		return r;
+	bo->tbo.base.funcs = &qxl_object_funcs;
+	bo->type = domain;
+	bo->surface_id = 0;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo->list);
+
+	qxl_ttm_placement_from_domain(bo, domain);
+
+	bo->tbo.priority = 0;
+	r = ttm_bo_init_reserved(&qdev->mman.bdev, &bo->tbo, type,
+				 &bo->placement, 0, &ctx, NULL, NULL,
+				 &qxl_panic_ttm_bo_destroy);
+	if (unlikely(r != 0)) {

unlikely() is used in several places. Does it really bring any benefit?

+		if (r != -ERESTARTSYS)
+			dev_err(qdev->ddev.dev,
+				"object_init failed for (%lu, 0x%08X)\n",
+				size, domain);
+		return r;
+	}
+	ttm_bo_unreserve(&bo->tbo);
+	return 0;
+}

...

CJ



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux