On Thu, 12 Sep 2024, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > Am 12.09.24 um 11:38 schrieb Jani Nikula: >> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Am 12.09.24 um 10:56 schrieb Jani Nikula: >>>> Moreover, in this case .detect() only detects digital displays as >>>> reported by EDID. If you postpone that to .get_modes(), the probe helper >>>> will still report connected, and invent non-EDID fallback modes. The >>>> behaviour changes. >>> The change in behavior is intentional, because the current test seems >>> arbitrary. Does the driver not work with analog outputs? >> Not on a DVI/HDMI port. Same with i915. >> >> That's possibly the only way to distinguish a DVI-A display connected to >> DVI-D source. > > That's a detect failure, but IMHO our probe helpers should really handle > this case. How? Allow returning detect failures from .get_modes()? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
