Re: [PATCH] drm/syncobj: Fix syncobj leak in drm_syncobj_eventfd_ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:30 AM Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 10.09.24 um 09:26 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
> >
> > On 09/09/2024 21:53, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> >> A syncobj reference is taken in drm_syncobj_find, but not released if
> >> eventfd_ctx_fdget or kzalloc fails. Put the reference in these error
> >> paths.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Xingyu Jin <xingyuj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Fixes: c7a472297169 ("drm/syncobj: add IOCTL to register an eventfd")
> >> Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> >>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >> index a0e94217b511..4fcfc0b9b386 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> >> @@ -1464,6 +1464,7 @@ drm_syncobj_eventfd_ioctl(struct drm_device
> >> *dev, void *data,
> >>       struct drm_syncobj *syncobj;
> >>       struct eventfd_ctx *ev_fd_ctx;
> >>       struct syncobj_eventfd_entry *entry;
> >> +    int ret;
> >>         if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE))
> >>           return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> @@ -1479,13 +1480,15 @@ drm_syncobj_eventfd_ioctl(struct drm_device
> >> *dev, void *data,
> >>           return -ENOENT;
> >>         ev_fd_ctx = eventfd_ctx_fdget(args->fd);
> >> -    if (IS_ERR(ev_fd_ctx))
> >> -        return PTR_ERR(ev_fd_ctx);
> >> +    if (IS_ERR(ev_fd_ctx)) {
> >> +        ret = PTR_ERR(ev_fd_ctx);
> >> +        goto err_fdget;
> >> +    }
> >>         entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>       if (!entry) {
> >> -        eventfd_ctx_put(ev_fd_ctx);
> >> -        return -ENOMEM;
> >> +        ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> +        goto err_kzalloc;
> >>       }
> >>       entry->syncobj = syncobj;
> >>       entry->ev_fd_ctx = ev_fd_ctx;
> >> @@ -1496,6 +1499,12 @@ drm_syncobj_eventfd_ioctl(struct drm_device
> >> *dev, void *data,
> >>       drm_syncobj_put(syncobj);
> >>         return 0;
> >> +
> >> +err_kzalloc:
> >> +    eventfd_ctx_put(ev_fd_ctx);
> >> +err_fdget:
> >> +    drm_syncobj_put(syncobj);
> >> +    return ret;
> >>   }
> >>     int
> >
> > Easy enough to review while browsing the list:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks reasonable to me as well.
>
> Reviewed-by. Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> CC: stable?

Yes, I think we should. 6.6 and 6.10

> Let me know when you need someone to push it to drm-misc-fixes.

Anytime is good, no rush for this one.

>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tvrtko
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux