在 2024/9/9 13:03, Kasireddy, Vivek 写道:
Hi Huan,Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] udmabuf: udmabuf_create pin folio codestyle cleanup 在 2024/9/6 16:17, Kasireddy, Vivek 写道:Hi Huan,Subject: [PATCH v5 4/7] udmabuf: udmabuf_create pin folio codestyle cleanup This patch split pin folios into single function: udmabuf_pin_folios. When record folio and offset into udmabuf_folio and offsets, the outer loop of this patch iterates through folios, while the inner loop correctly sets the folio and corresponding offset into the udmabuf starting from the offset. if reach to pgcnt or nr_folios, end of loop. By this, more readable. Signed-off-by: Huan Yang <link@xxxxxxxx> --- drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c index 456db58446e1..ca2b21c5c57f 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c @@ -330,17 +330,67 @@ static int export_udmabuf(struct udmabuf*ubuf,return dma_buf_fd(buf, flags); } +static int udmabuf_pin_folios(struct udmabuf *ubuf, struct file *memfd, + loff_t start, loff_t size) +{ + pgoff_t pgoff, pgcnt, upgcnt = ubuf->pagecount; + u32 cur_folio, cur_pgcnt; + struct folio **folios = NULL; + long nr_folios; + loff_t end; + int ret = 0;Change ret's type and this function's return type to long for consistency.+ + pgcnt = size >> PAGE_SHIFT; + folios = kvmalloc_array(pgcnt, sizeof(*folios), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!folios) + return -ENOMEM; + + end = start + (pgcnt << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; + nr_folios = memfd_pin_folios(memfd, start, end, folios, pgcnt, &pgoff); + if (nr_folios <= 0) { + ret = nr_folios ? nr_folios : -EINVAL; + goto err; + } + + cur_pgcnt = 0; + for (cur_folio = 0; cur_folio < nr_folios; ++cur_folio) { + pgoff_t subpgoff = pgoff; + size_t fsize = folio_size(folios[cur_folio]); + + ret = add_to_unpin_list(&ubuf->unpin_list, folios[cur_folio]); + if (ret < 0) + goto err; + + for (; subpgoff < fsize; subpgoff += PAGE_SIZE) { + ubuf->folios[upgcnt] = folios[cur_folio]; + ubuf->offsets[upgcnt] = subpgoff; + ++upgcnt; + + if (++cur_pgcnt >= pgcnt) + goto end; + } + + /** + * The term range may start with offset, so the first folio + * need take care of it. And the remain folio start from 0.The comments above are not very meaningful. Please rewrite them as: * In a given range, only the first subpage of the first folio has an offset, that * is returned by memfd_pin_folios(). The first subpages of other folios (inthe* range) have an offset of 0.+ */ + pgoff = 0; + } +end: +err:No need to have two labels here. Keep end and get rid of err?+ ubuf->pagecount = upgcnt; + kvfree(folios); + return ret; +} + static long udmabuf_create(struct miscdevice *device, struct udmabuf_create_list *head, struct udmabuf_create_item *list) { - pgoff_t pgoff, pgcnt, pglimit, pgbuf = 0; - long nr_folios, ret = -EINVAL; - struct file *memfd = NULL; - struct folio **folios; + pgoff_t pgcnt = 0, pglimit; + long ret = -EINVAL; struct udmabuf *ubuf; - u32 i, j, k, flags; - loff_t end; + u32 i, flags; ubuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*ubuf), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ubuf) @@ -349,81 +399,43 @@ static long udmabuf_create(struct miscdevice *device, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ubuf->unpin_list); pglimit = (size_limit_mb * 1024 * 1024) >> PAGE_SHIFT; for (i = 0; i < head->count; i++) { - if (!IS_ALIGNED(list[i].offset, PAGE_SIZE)) + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(list[i].offset)) goto err; - if (!IS_ALIGNED(list[i].size, PAGE_SIZE)) + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(list[i].size)) goto err; - ubuf->pagecount += list[i].size >> PAGE_SHIFT; - if (ubuf->pagecount > pglimit) + + pgcnt += list[i].size >> PAGE_SHIFT; + if (pgcnt > pglimit) goto err; } - if (!ubuf->pagecount) + if (!pgcnt) goto err; - ubuf->folios = kvmalloc_array(ubuf->pagecount, sizeof(*ubuf-folios),- GFP_KERNEL); + ubuf->folios = kvmalloc_array(pgcnt, sizeof(*ubuf->folios), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ubuf->folios) { ret = -ENOMEM; goto err; } - ubuf->offsets = kvcalloc(ubuf->pagecount, sizeof(*ubuf->offsets), - GFP_KERNEL); + + ubuf->offsets = kvcalloc(pgcnt, sizeof(*ubuf->offsets), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ubuf->offsets) { ret = -ENOMEM; goto err; } - pgbuf = 0; for (i = 0; i < head->count; i++) { - memfd = fget(list[i].memfd); + struct file *memfd = fget(list[i].memfd); + ret = check_memfd_seals(memfd); if (ret < 0) goto err; - pgcnt = list[i].size >> PAGE_SHIFT; - folios = kvmalloc_array(pgcnt, sizeof(*folios), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!folios) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto err; - } - - end = list[i].offset + (pgcnt << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; - ret = memfd_pin_folios(memfd, list[i].offset, end, - folios, pgcnt, &pgoff); - if (ret <= 0) { - kvfree(folios); - if (!ret) - ret = -EINVAL; - goto err; - } - - nr_folios = ret; - pgoff >>= PAGE_SHIFT; - for (j = 0, k = 0; j < pgcnt; j++) { - ubuf->folios[pgbuf] = folios[k]; - ubuf->offsets[pgbuf] = pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT; - - if (j == 0 || ubuf->folios[pgbuf-1] != folios[k]) { - ret = add_to_unpin_list(&ubuf->unpin_list, - folios[k]); - if (ret < 0) { - kfree(folios); - goto err; - } - } - - pgbuf++; - if (++pgoff == folio_nr_pages(folios[k])) { - pgoff = 0; - if (++k == nr_folios) - break; - } - } - - kvfree(folios); + ret = udmabuf_pin_folios(ubuf, memfd, list[i].offset, + list[i].size); fput(memfd); - memfd = NULL; + if (ret) + goto err; } flags = head->flags & UDMABUF_FLAGS_CLOEXEC ? O_CLOEXEC : 0; @@ -434,8 +446,6 @@ static long udmabuf_create(struct miscdevice *device, return ret; err: - if (memfd) - fput(memfd);I think this needs to stay because if the seals check fails, then we would notbedoing fput(memfd).Yes, there a mistake, but I'd like set it into here: ret = check_memfd_seals(memfd); if (ret < 0) {You still need an if (memfd) check here because check_memfd_seals() might do: if (!memfd) return -EBADFD;
Yes, fput do not check if pointer is NULL. Thanks.
Thanks, Vivekfput(memfd); goto err; } due to only in inner look, memfd can get. and memfd change into loop var. ThanksThanks, Vivekunpin_all_folios(&ubuf->unpin_list); kvfree(ubuf->offsets); kvfree(ubuf->folios); -- 2.45.2
