On Wed, 04 Sep 2024, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:31:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value_cansleep' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 31 | gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tdp158->enable, 1);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_probe':
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:80:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'devm_gpiod_get_optional'; did you mean 'devm_regulator_get_optional'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 80 | tdp158->enable = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | devm_regulator_get_optional
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:80:65: error: 'GPIOD_OUT_LOW' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 80 | tdp158->enable = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:80:65: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a15710027afb ("drm/bridge: add support for TI TDP158")
>
> I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20240903 for today.
Fixed by commit 532f0d109658 ("drm/bridge/tdp158: fix build failure") in
drm-misc-next.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
