Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] pmdomain: ti-sci: Support retaining PD boot time state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ulf,

On 03/05/2024 16:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
+ Abel, Saravanna, Stephen

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 19:17, Tomi Valkeinen
<tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 15/04/2024 19:00, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Add a new flag, TI_SCI_PD_KEEP_BOOT_STATE, which can be set in the dts
when referring to power domains. When this flag is set, the ti-sci
driver will check if the PD is currently enabled in the HW, and if so,
set the GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON flag so that the PD will stay enabled.

The main issue I'm trying to solve here is this:

If the Display Subsystem (DSS) has been enabled by the bootloader, the
related PD has also been enabled in the HW. When the tidss driver
probes, the driver framework will automatically enable the PD. While
executing the probe function it is very common for the probe to return
EPROBE_DEFER, and, in rarer cases, an actual error. When this happens
(probe() returns an error), the driver framework will automatically
disable the related PD.

Powering off the PD while the DSS is enabled and displaying a picture
will cause the DSS HW to enter a bad state, from which (afaik) it can't
be woken up except with full power-cycle. Trying to access the DSS in
this state (e.g. when retrying the probe) will usually cause the board
to hang sooner or later.

Even if we wouldn't have this board-hangs issue, it's nice to be able to
keep the DSS PD enabled: we want to keep the DSS enabled when the
bootloader has enabled the screen. If, instead, we disable the PD at the
first EPROBE_DEFER, the screen will (probably) go black.

A few things occurred to me. The driver is supposed to clear the
GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON when the driver has probed successfully. There are
two possible issues with that:

- Afaics, there's no API to do that, and currently I just clear the bit
in genpd->flags. There's a clear race there, so some locking would be
required.

- This uses the GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON flag to say "PD is always on, until
the driver has started". If the PD would have GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON set
for other reasons, the driver would still go and clear the flag, which
might break things.

Also, unrelated to the above and not a problem in practice at the very
moment, but I think clocks should also be dealt with somehow. Something,
at early-ish boot stage, should mark the relevant clocks as in use, so
that there's no chance they would be turned off when the main kernel has
started (the main display driver is often a module).

It would be nice to deal with all the above in a single place. I wonder
if the tidss driver itself could somehow be split into two parts, an
early part that would probe with minimal dependencies, mainly to reserve
the core resources without doing any kind of DRM init. And a main part
which would (somehow) finish the initialization at a later point, when
we have the filesystem (for firmware) and the other bridge/panel drivers
have probed.

That can be somewhat achieved with simplefb or simpledrm, though, but we
can't do any TI DSS specific things there, and it also creates a
requirement to have either of those drivers built-in, and the related DT
nodes to be added.

Without going into too much detail, this and similar problems have
been discussed in the past. With the fw_devlink and the ->sync_state()
callback we are getting closer to a solution, but for genpd a solution
is still pending.

If you want to read up on earlier discussions and join us moving
forward, that would be great. The last attempt for genpd to move this
forward was posted by Abel Vesa:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230621144019.3219858-1-abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx/

Beyond that, we have also discussed various solutions at the last LPC
in Richmond. I think the consensus at that point was that Saravana
targeted to post something for clocks - and when that was done, we
should do the similar thing for genpd. Anyway, I have looped them into
this thread, so they can share any updates on their side of the
matter.

Do you know if there's been any recent work related to this? I tried to look around on the lists, but nothing caught my eye.

 Tomi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux