回复: 回复: [PATCH] drm: komeda: Fix an issue related to normalized zpos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Liviu,

	I'll initialize 'slave_zpos' to zero and resend the [patch v2] soon, thanks!

Best Regards,
Hongchi Peng

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx> 
发送时间: 2024年8月24日 20:33
收件人: Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰 <hongchi.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
抄送: maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mripard@xxxxxxxxxx; tzimmermann@xxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: 回复: [PATCH] drm: komeda: Fix an issue related to normalized zpos

On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:53:06AM +0000, Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰 wrote:
> Hi, Liviu,

Hi,

> 
> I'm sorry for my carelessness and thanks for your correction, the corrected patch is as follows. 
> And we do have an extra patch to set layer_split, but this part of the 
> code is owned by my colleague, So that I cannot upload it, sorry about this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: hongchi.peng <hongchi.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This cannot be your commit message. If you want to make comments in a patch, I suggest you put them after a three-line dash, like this:

---
Add your comment here

> ---

Keep this marker as it will signal the start of the patch.

>  drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> index fe46b0ebefea..ab769a0a4afa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  	struct drm_plane *plane;
>  	struct list_head zorder_list;
>  	int order = 0, err;
> +	u32 slave_zpos;

Can you please initialise this to zero?

>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[CRTC:%d:%s] calculating normalized zpos values\n",
>  			 crtc->base.id, crtc->name);
> @@ -199,10 +200,13 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  				 plane_st->zpos, plane_st->normalized_zpos);
>  
>  		/* calculate max slave zorder */
> -		if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes))
> +		if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes)) {
> +			slave_zpos = plane_st->normalized_zpos;
> +			if (to_kplane_st(plane_st)->layer_split)
> +				slave_zpos++;
>  			kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder =
> -				max(plane_st->normalized_zpos,
> -				    kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
> +				max(slave_zpos, kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	crtc_st->zpos_changed = true;
> --
> 2.34.1
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hongchi Peng

Also, can you version your patches to help me track them better?

Best regards,
Liviu

> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx>
> 发送时间: 2024年8月22日 22:05
> 收件人: Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰 <hongchi.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 抄送: maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mripard@xxxxxxxxxx; 
> tzimmermann@xxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx; 
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] drm: komeda: Fix an issue related to normalized zpos
> 
> Hi Hongchi,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 04:56:13PM +0800, hongchi.peng wrote:
> > We use komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos to normalize zpos of affected 
> > planes to their blending zorder in CU. If there's only one slave 
> > plane in affected planes and its layer_split property is enabled, 
> > order++ for its split layer, so that when calculating the 
> > normalized_zpos of master planes, the split layer of the slave plane 
> > is included, but the max_slave_zorder does not include the split 
> > layer and keep zero because there's only one slave plane in affacted 
> > planes, although we actually use two slave layers in this commit.
> > 
> > In most cases, this bug does not result in a commit failure, but 
> > assume the following situation:
> >     slave_layer 0: zpos = 0, layer split enabled, normalized_zpos =
> >     0;(use slave_layer 2 as its split layer)
> >     master_layer 0: zpos = 2, layer_split enabled, normalized_zpos =
> >     2;(use master_layer 2 as its split layer)
> >     master_layer 1: zpos = 4, normalized_zpos = 4;
> >     master_layer 3: zpos = 5, normalized_zpos = 5;
> >     kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder = 0;
> > When we use master_layer 3 as a input of CU in function 
> > komeda_compiz_set_input and check it with function 
> > komeda_component_check_input, the parameter idx is equal to 
> > normailzed_zpos minus max_slave_zorder, the value of idx is 5 and is 
> > euqal to CU's max_active_inputs, so that 
> > komeda_component_check_input returns a -EINVAL value.
> 
> Yes, indeed, you have found a bug in the calculations when layer_split is set.
> But I was also looking through the code trying to find where layer_split gets set and I could not find it, do you have some extra patches?
> 
> > 
> > To fix the bug described above, when calculating the 
> > max_slave_zorder with the layer_split enabled, count the split layer 
> > in this calculation directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: hongchi.peng <hongchi.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c | 11 +++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> > index fe46b0ebefea..b3db828284e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> > @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >  	struct drm_plane_state *plane_st;
> >  	struct drm_plane *plane;
> >  	struct list_head zorder_list;
> > -	int order = 0, err;
> > +	int order = 0, slave_zpos, err;
> 
> Also, the build bot has already flagged it, your patch needs some improvements.
> slave_zpos needs to be u32 if it's going to be compared against max_slave_zorder.
> 
> Best regards,
> Liviu
> 
> >  
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[CRTC:%d:%s] calculating normalized zpos values\n",
> >  			 crtc->base.id, crtc->name);
> > @@ -199,10 +199,13 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >  				 plane_st->zpos, plane_st->normalized_zpos);
> >  
> >  		/* calculate max slave zorder */
> > -		if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes))
> > +		if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes)) {
> > +			slave_zpos = plane_st->normalized_zpos;
> > +			if (to_kplane_st(plane_st)->layer_split)
> > +				slave_zpos++;
> >  			kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder =
> > -				max(plane_st->normalized_zpos,
> > -				    kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
> > +				max(slave_zpos, kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	crtc_st->zpos_changed = true;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> > 
> 
> --
> ====================
> | I would like to |
> | fix the world,  |
> | but they're not |
> | giving me the   |
>  \ source code!  /
>   ---------------
>     ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux