Hi Laurent, Morimoto-san,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 08:03:16PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Morimoto-san,
>
> (CC'ing Sakari)
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 04:22:22AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > We have endpoint base functions
> > - of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint()
> > - of_graph_get_device_endpoint_count()
> > - for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint()
> >
> > Here, for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint() loop finds each endpoints
> >
> > ports {
> > port@0 {
> > (1) endpoint {...};
> > };
> > port@1 {
> > (2) endpoint {...};
> > };
> > ...
> > };
> >
> > In above case, it finds endpoint as (1) -> (2) -> ...
> >
> > Basically, user/driver knows which port is used for what, but not in
> > all cases. For example on flexible/generic driver case, how many ports
> > are used is not fixed.
> >
> > For example Sound Generic Card driver which is used from many venders
> > can't know how many ports are used. Because the driver is very
> > flexible/generic, it is impossible to know how many ports are used,
> > it depends on each vender SoC and/or its used board.
> >
> > And more, the port can have multi endpoints. For example Generic Sound
> > Card case, it supports many type of connection between CPU / Codec, and
> > some of them uses multi endpoint in one port.
> > Then, Generic Sound Card want to handle each connection via "port"
> > instead of "endpoint".
> > But, it is very difficult to handle each "port" via
> > for_each_of_graph_device_endpoint(). Getting "port" by using
> > of_get_parent() from "endpoint" doesn't work. see below.
> >
> > ports {
> > port@0 {
> > (1) endpoint@0 {...};
> > (2) endpoint@1 {...};
> > };
> > port@1 {
> > (3) endpoint {...};
> > };
> > ...
> > };
> >
> > In the same time, same reason, we want to handle "ports" same as "port".
> >
> > node {
> > => ports@0 {
> > port@0 {
> > endpoint@0 {...};
> > endpoint@1 {...};
> > ...
> > };
> > port@1 {
> > endpoint@0 {...};
> > endpoint@1 {...};
> > ...
> > };
> > ...
> > };
> > => ports@1 {
> > ...
> > };
> > };
> >
> > Add "ports" / "port" base functions.
> > For above case, we can use
> >
> > for_each_of_graph_ports(node, ports) {
> > for_each_of_graph_port(ports, port) {
> > ...
> > }
> > }
> >
> > This loop works in case of "node" doesn't have "ports" also.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/property.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/of_graph.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> > index 164d77cb9445..e4d5dfe70104 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> > @@ -625,6 +625,76 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_port_by_id(struct device_node *parent, u32 id)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_port_by_id);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * of_graph_get_next_ports() - get next ports node.
> > + * @parent: pointer to the parent device node
> > + * @prev: previous ports node, or NULL to get first
> > + *
> > + * If "parent" node doesn't have "ports" node, it returns "parent" node itself as "ports" node.
> > + *
> > + * Return: A 'ports' node pointer with refcount incremented. Refcount
> > + * of the passed @prev node is decremented.
> > + */
> > +struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_ports(struct device_node *parent,
> > + struct device_node *prev)
> > +{
> > + if (!parent)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (!prev) {
> > + prev = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "ports");
> > +
> > + /* use parent as its ports of this device if it not exist */
> > + if (!prev)
> > + prev = of_node_get(parent);
> > +
> > + return prev;
> > + }
> > +
> > + do {
> > + prev = of_get_next_child(parent, prev);
> > + if (!prev)
> > + break;
> > + } while (!of_node_name_eq(prev, "ports"));
> > +
> > + return prev;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_next_ports);
>
> Having multiple "ports" nodes in a device node is not something I've
> ever seen before. There may be use cases, but how widespread are they ?
> I would prefer handling this in driver code instead of creating a helper
> function if the use case is rare.
I wonder if this is allowed by the graph schema. Probably not.
>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * of_graph_get_next_port() - get next port node.
> > + * @parent: pointer to the parent device node, or parent ports node
> > + * @prev: previous port node, or NULL to get first
> > + *
> > + * Parent device node can be used as @parent whether device node has ports node or not.
> > + * It will work same as ports@0 node.
> > + *
> > + * Return: A 'port' node pointer with refcount incremented. Refcount
> > + * of the passed @prev node is decremented.
> > + */
> > +struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(struct device_node *parent,
> > + struct device_node *prev)
> > +{
> > + if (!parent)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (!prev) {
> > + struct device_node *ports __free(device_node) =
> > + of_graph_get_next_ports(parent, NULL);
>
> This also makes me quite uncomfortable. Iterating over all ports of a
> device node that contains multiple "ports" children seems an ill-defined
> use case.
>
> > +
> > + return of_get_child_by_name(ports, "port");
> > + }
> > +
> > + do {
> > + prev = of_get_next_child(parent, prev);
> > + if (!prev)
> > + break;
> > + } while (!of_node_name_eq(prev, "port"));
> > +
> > + return prev;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_next_port);
> > +
> > /**
> > * of_graph_get_next_endpoint() - get next endpoint node
> > * @parent: pointer to the parent device node
> > @@ -823,6 +893,24 @@ unsigned int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_endpoint_count);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * of_graph_get_port_count() - get the number of port in a device node
> > + * @np: pointer to the parent device node
> > + *
> > + * Return: count of port of this device node
> > + */
> > +unsigned int of_graph_get_port_count(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *port = NULL;
> > + int num = 0;
>
> As the counter can never be negative, you can make this an unsigned int.
>
> > +
> > + for_each_of_graph_port(np, port)
> > + num++;
> > +
> > + return num;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_port_count);
> > +
> > /**
> > * of_graph_get_remote_node() - get remote parent device_node for given port/endpoint
> > * @node: pointer to parent device_node containing graph port/endpoint
> > diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> > index a4bea62bfa29..a6b91577700a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> > @@ -37,14 +37,41 @@ struct of_endpoint {
> > for (child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
> > child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, child))
> >
> > +/**
> > + * for_each_of_graph_ports - iterate over every ports in a device node
> > + * @parent: parent device node containing ports
> > + * @child: loop variable pointing to the current ports node
> > + *
> > + * When breaking out of the loop, of_node_put(child) has to be called manually.
> > + */
> > +#define for_each_of_graph_ports(parent, child) \
> > + for (child = of_graph_get_next_ports(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
> > + child = of_graph_get_next_ports(parent, child))
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * for_each_of_graph_port - iterate over every port in a device or ports node
> > + * @parent: parent device or ports node containing port
> > + * @child: loop variable pointing to the current port node
> > + *
> > + * When breaking out of the loop, of_node_put(child) has to be called manually.
> > + */
> > +#define for_each_of_graph_port(parent, child) \
> > + for (child = of_graph_get_next_port(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
> > + child = of_graph_get_next_port(parent, child))
>
> I think I've proposed something similar a looooong time ago, and was
> told that iterating over ports is not something that drivers should do.
> The situation may have changed since though.
>
> Sakari, any opinion on this ?
It'd be good to understand first what would be the use case for it. There
is already a function to obtain endpoints within a given port, including an
fwnode equivalent.
>
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
> > int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
> > struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
> > unsigned int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np);
> > +unsigned int of_graph_get_port_count(struct device_node *np);
> > struct device_node *of_graph_get_port_by_id(struct device_node *node, u32 id);
> > struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> > struct device_node *previous);
> > +struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_ports(struct device_node *parent,
> > + struct device_node *ports);
> > +struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(struct device_node *parent,
> > + struct device_node *port);
> > struct device_node *of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(
> > const struct device_node *parent, int port_reg, int reg);
> > struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(
> > @@ -73,6 +100,11 @@ static inline unsigned int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline unsigned int of_graph_get_port_count(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_port_by_id(
> > struct device_node *node, u32 id)
> > {
> > @@ -86,6 +118,20 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_ports(
> > + struct device_node *parent,
> > + struct device_node *previous)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(
> > + struct device_node *parent,
> > + struct device_node *previous)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(
> > const struct device_node *parent, int port_reg, int reg)
> > {
>
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
