Hi, Rob: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2024年8月1日 週四 上午4:14寫道： > > of_property_read_u32() returns -EINVAL if a property is not present, so > the preceeding check for presence with of_find_property() can be > dropped. Really, what the errno is shouldn't matter. Either the property > can be read and used or it can't and is ignored. > > This is part of a larger effort to remove callers of of_find_property() > and similar functions. of_find_property() leaks the DT struct property > and data pointers which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes > which may be freed. Applied to mediatek-drm-next [1], thanks. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chunkuang.hu/linux.git/log/?h=mediatek-drm-next Regards, Chun-Kuang. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c | 13 +++++-------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c > index 634bbba5d43f..07243f372260 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c > @@ -341,14 +341,11 @@ static int mtk_disp_rdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dev_dbg(dev, "get mediatek,gce-client-reg fail!\n"); > #endif > > - if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "mediatek,rdma-fifo-size", &ret)) { > - ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, > - "mediatek,rdma-fifo-size", > - &priv->fifo_size); > - if (ret) > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, > - "Failed to get rdma fifo size\n"); > - } > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, > + "mediatek,rdma-fifo-size", > + &priv->fifo_size); > + if (ret && (ret != -EINVAL)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get rdma fifo size\n"); > > /* Disable and clear pending interrupts */ > writel(0x0, priv->regs + DISP_REG_RDMA_INT_ENABLE); > -- > 2.43.0 >
