On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:49:23PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:00:27PM +0300, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 12:57:54PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 02:48:08PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > I don't understand what interest might have someone in a couple > > > of years, reading this commit, knowing an unintellegible list of > > > differences between v2 and v3. > > > > > > I consider it a random pollution of the commit log. > > I agree it is ugly. But I don't agree it is just a 'random polution'. Since lore is in place and under the control of LF, this _becomes_ a random pollution. Somebody needs to change some scripts and too conservative workflows :-) > I consider a valid and very useful information of the patch history. So, we have a Link: tag. As long as the changelog was published there it's being archived. > Very useful for a later cross check to know what exactly version > of that patch got merged. > Useful for distros on backports as well. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko