Hi Michal
I did give Tested-by before. If you need Acks, Here I can give
Acked-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@xxxxxxx> for the seriesBest Regards!
James
On 2024-08-13 20:18, Michał Winiarski
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 01:38:38PM GMT, Alex Deucher wrote:Are there any objections to this series? We have been running into this limit as a problem for a while now on big servers.I don't think there were any objections, just a general lack of interest - so there are no R-b / Acks. If you're interested to have a go at it - I can resend it. It should still apply on latest drm-tip. -MichałAlex On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 5:15 PM Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:64 DRM device nodes is not enough for everyone. Upgrade it to ~512K (which definitely is more than enough). To allow testing userspace support for >64 devices, add additional DRM modparam (force_extended_minors) which causes DRM to skip allocating minors in 0-192 range. Additionally - convert minors to use XArray instead of IDR to simplify the locking. v1 -> v2: Don't touch DRM_MINOR_CONTROL and its range (Simon Ser) v2 -> v3: Don't use legacy scheme for >=192 minor range (Dave Airlie) Add modparam for testing (Dave Airlie) Add lockdep annotation for IDR (Daniel Vetter) v3 -> v4: Convert from IDR to XArray (Matthew Wilcox) v4 -> v5: Fixup IDR to XArray conversion (Matthew Wilcox) v5 -> v6: Also convert Accel to XArray Rename skip_legacy_minors to force_extended_minors Michał Winiarski (4): drm: Use XArray instead of IDR for minors accel: Use XArray instead of IDR for minors drm: Expand max DRM device number to full MINORBITS drm: Introduce force_extended_minors modparam drivers/accel/drm_accel.c | 110 +++------------------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h | 4 -- include/drm/drm_accel.h | 18 +----- include/drm/drm_file.h | 5 ++ 6 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-) -- 2.41.0
