On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 2:08 PM Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Andi Shyti (2024-08-06 12:46:07) > > Hi Greg, > > > > same question without the stable mailing list not to trigger the > > automatic reply. > > > > > Andi Shyti (2): > > > drm/i915/gem: Adjust vma offset for framebuffer mmap offset > > > drm/i915/gem: Fix Virtual Memory mapping boundaries calculation > > > > I have forgotten to actually Cc the stable mailing list here. > > These two patches need to be merged together even if only the > > second patch has the "Fixes:" tag. > > > > I could have used the "Requires:" tag, but the commit id would > > change in between merges and rebases. > > The patches were the top two in drm-intel-gt-next and committed > only few hours ago so I fixed up the patches adding Cc: stable > and Requires: I'm not very familiar with how the DRM trees work - shouldn't fixes in i915 go on the separate drm-intel-fixes branch so that they don't have to wait for a merge window?
