Re: [PATCH 2/9] of: property: add of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/08/2024 07:58, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
We already have of_graph_get_next_endpoint(), but it is not
intuitive to use.

(X)	node {
(Y)		ports {
			port@0 { endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; };};
(A1)			port@1 { endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; };
(A2)				 endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; };};
(B)			port@2 { endpoint { remote-endpoint = ...; };};
		};
	};

For example, if I want to handle port@1's 2 endpoints (= A1, A2),
I want to use like below

	A1 = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, NULL);
	A2 = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, A1);

But 1st one will be error, because of_graph_get_next_endpoint()
requested "parent" means "node" (X) or "ports" (Y), not "port".
Below are OK

	/* These will be node/ports/port@0/endpoint */
	of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node,  NULL);
	of_graph_get_next_endpoint(ports, NULL);

In other words, we can't handle A1/A2 directly via
of_graph_get_next_endpoint() so far.

There is another non intuitive behavior on of_graph_get_next_endpoint().
In case of if I could get A1 pointer for some way, and if I want to
handle port@1 things, I would like use it like below

	/*
	 * "ep" is now A1, and handle port1 things here,
	 * but we don't know how many endpoints port1 has.
	 *
	 * Because "ep" is non NULL, we can use port1
	 * as of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, xxx)
	 */
	do {
		/* do something for port1 specific things here */
	} while (ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(port1, ep))

But it also not worked as I expected.
I expect it will be A1 -> A2 -> NULL,
but      it will be A1 -> A2 -> B,    because
of_graph_get_next_endpoint() will fetch "endpoint" beyond the "port".

It is not useful on generic driver like Generic Sound Card.
It uses of_get_next_child() instead for now, but it is not intuitive.
And it doesn't check node name (= "endpoint").

To handle endpoint more intuitive, create of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint()

	of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(port1, NULL); // A1
	of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(port1, A1);   // A2
	of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(port1, A2);   // NULL

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/of/property.c    | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/of_graph.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index 3b2d09c0376a..de56795a7362 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -692,6 +692,28 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(struct device_node *parent,
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_next_port);
+/**
+ * of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint() - get next endpoint node in port.
+ * If it reached to end of the port, it will return NULL.
+ * @port: pointer to the target port node
+ * @endpoint: current endpoint node, or NULL to get first
+ *
+ * Return: An 'endpoint' node pointer with refcount incremented. Refcount
+ * of the passed @prev node is decremented.
+ */

Same issues here too. No "prev" parameter, and I suggest using "previous", not "current", to be consistent with of_graph_get_next_endpoint(). (or alternatively, change of_graph_get_next_endpoint()).

Oh, the declaration of the function uses "prev", but the implementation "endpoint". Please make the naming same.

+struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(const struct device_node *port,
+						    struct device_node *endpoint)
+{
+	do {
+		endpoint = of_get_next_child(port, endpoint);
+		if (!endpoint)
+			break;
+	} while (!of_node_name_eq(endpoint, "endpoint"));
+
+	return endpoint;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint);
+
  /**
   * of_graph_get_next_endpoint() - get next endpoint node
   *
diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
index 30169b50b042..8b4777938c5e 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
@@ -59,6 +59,17 @@ struct of_endpoint {
  	for (child = of_graph_get_next_port(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
  	     child = of_graph_get_next_port(parent, child))
+/**
+ * for_each_of_graph_port_endpoint - iterate over every endpoint in a port node
+ * @parent: parent device or ports node

Hmm, shouldn't the parent be a port node?

+ * @child: loop variable pointing to the current endpoint node
+ *
+ * When breaking out of the loop, of_node_put(child) has to be called manually.
+ */
+#define for_each_of_graph_port_endpoint(parent, child)			\
+		for (child = of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
+		     child = of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(parent, child))
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
  bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
  int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
@@ -73,6 +84,8 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_ports(struct device_node *parent,
  					    struct device_node *ports);
  struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(struct device_node *parent,
  					   struct device_node *port);
+struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(const struct device_node *port,
+						    struct device_node *prev);
  struct device_node *of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(
  		const struct device_node *parent, int port_reg, int reg);
  struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(
@@ -133,6 +146,13 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port(
  	return NULL;
  }
+static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_port_endpoint(
+					const struct device_node *parent,
+					struct device_node *previous)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
  static inline struct device_node *of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(
  		const struct device_node *parent, int port_reg, int reg)
  {

 Tomi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux