Re: [PATCH V2 09/16] drm/vc4: v3d: simplify clock retrieval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Maíra,

Am 07.08.24 um 16:31 schrieb Maíra Canal:
Hi Stefan,

On 8/2/24 10:00, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Hi Maíra,

Am 02.08.24 um 14:56 schrieb Maíra Canal:
Hi Stefan,

On 7/31/24 13:41, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Hi Maíra,

Am 30.07.24 um 13:23 schrieb Maíra Canal:
On 7/28/24 10:00, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
dev_err_probe() and devm_clk_get_optional(). This results in much
less code.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_v3d.c | 13 ++-----------
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_v3d.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_v3d.c
index 1ede508a67d3..4bf3a8d24770 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_v3d.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_v3d.c
@@ -441,20 +441,11 @@ static int vc4_v3d_bind(struct device *dev,
struct device *master, void *data)
      vc4->v3d = v3d;
      v3d->vc4 = vc4;

-    v3d->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+    v3d->clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, NULL);
      if (IS_ERR(v3d->clk)) {
          int ret = PTR_ERR(v3d->clk);


Super nit: you could delete this line ^
Can you please explain? ret is required for dev_err_probe or do you
mean
the empty line after the declaration?

Just deleting the empty line after the declaration. It is a super small
nit indeed.
AFAIK an empty line after a declaration is part of the coding style. Or
is different in drm?

TBH I just checked the result of `git grep "dev_err_probe"` and I
noticed that most of the times, we don't add an empty line after the
declaration in this case or we don't even create a variable, something
like:

return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(v3d->clk), "Failed to get V3D clock\n");
i will go for the latter variant.

I will send a new version which also addresses your comments regarding
patch 7, so they can be applied at once.

But i still need to wait for some feedback for patch 14 before sending
v3, which is the most important part of the series. But I also hope that
some of the firmware/mailbox/pmdomain patches at the beginning are also
applied before.


But it is a pretty small nit. Feel free to ignore it.

Also, let me know if you need me to apply any patches to drm-misc-next.

Yes, this would be nice to apply the vc4/v3d stuff in the next version,
so the series becomes shorter and easier to handle.

Best regards




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux