On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 02:13:57PM +0000, Daniel Gomez wrote: > > Also, as this is not internal for the kernel, but rather for userspace > > builds, shouldn't the include/ path be different? > > Can you suggest an alternative path or provide documentation that could help > identify the correct location? Perhaps usr/include? That is better than the generic include path as you are attempting to mix userspace and kernel headers in the same directory :(
