On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 08:08:57AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/07/2024 02:47, Alex Lanzano wrote:
> > +static const struct spi_device_id sharp_memory_ids[] = {
> > + {"ls010b7dh04", LS010B7DH04},
> > + {"ls011b7dh03", LS011B7DH03},
> > + {"ls012b7dd01", LS012B7DD01},
> > + {"ls013b7dh03", LS013B7DH03},
> > + {"ls013b7dh05", LS013B7DH05},
> > + {"ls018b7dh02", LS018B7DH02},
> > + {"ls027b7dh01", LS027B7DH01},
> > + {"ls027b7dh01a", LS027B7DH01A},
> > + {"ls032b7dd02", LS032B7DD02},
> > + {"ls044q7dh01", LS044Q7DH01},
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, sharp_memory_ids);
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id sharp_memory_of_match[] = {
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls010b7dh04"},
>
> Both ID tables should be in sync. See not-so-recent IIO discussions and
> commits.
>
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls011b7dh03"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls012b7dd01"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls013b7dh03"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls013b7dh05"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls018b7dh02"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls027b7dh01"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls027b7dh01a"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls032b7dd02"},
> > + {.compatible = "sharp,ls044q7dh01"},
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sharp_memory_of_match);
I'm having some trouble finding the discussions and commits you're referring to.
When you say the tables should be in sync are you referring to the ordering of
entries in the tables? Like at index x of both tables should define model y?
Best regards,
Alex
