Re: [PATCH] drm: renesas: shmobile: shmo_drm_crtc: Fix PM imbalance if RPM_ACTIVE is true

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 09:27:09AM GMT, Biju Das wrote:
> The pm_runtime_resume_and_get() returns 1 if RPM is active, in this
> case it won't call a put. This will result in PM imbalance as it
> treat this as an error and propagate this to caller and the caller
> never calls corresponding put(). Fix this issue by checking error
> condition only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/shmobile/shmob_drm_crtc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/shmobile/shmob_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/shmobile/shmob_drm_crtc.c
> index 2e2f37b9d0a4..42a5d6876bec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/shmobile/shmob_drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/shmobile/shmob_drm_crtc.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void shmob_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret < 0)
>  		return;

The documentation of pm_runtime_resume_and_get says that:

  Resume @dev synchronously and if that is successful, increment its
  runtime PM usage counter. Return 0 if the runtime PM usage counter of
  @dev has been incremented or a negative error code otherwise.

So it looks like it can't return 1, ever. Are you sure you're not
confusing pm_runtime_resume_and_get with pm_runtime_get?

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux