Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add way to debug pgtable walk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:14 AM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:52:21AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add an io-pgtable method to walk the pgtable returning the raw PTEs that
> > would be traversed for a given iova access.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  include/linux/io-pgtable.h     |  4 +++
> >  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > index f7828a7aad41..f47a0e64bb35 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > @@ -693,17 +693,19 @@ static size_t arm_lpae_unmap_pages(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iov
> >                               data->start_level, ptep);
> >  }
> >
> > -static phys_addr_t arm_lpae_iova_to_phys(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops,
> > -                                      unsigned long iova)
> > +static int arm_lpae_pgtable_walk(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops, unsigned long iova,
> > +                     int (*cb)(void *cb_data, void *pte, int level),
> > +                     void *cb_data)
> >  {
> >       struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data = io_pgtable_ops_to_data(ops);
> >       arm_lpae_iopte pte, *ptep = data->pgd;
> >       int lvl = data->start_level;
> > +     int ret;
> >
> >       do {
> >               /* Valid IOPTE pointer? */
> >               if (!ptep)
> > -                     return 0;
> > +                     return -EFAULT;
>
> nit: -ENOENT might be a little better, as we're only checking against a
> NULL entry rather than strictly any faulting entry.
>
> >               /* Grab the IOPTE we're interested in */
> >               ptep += ARM_LPAE_LVL_IDX(iova, lvl, data);
> > @@ -711,22 +713,52 @@ static phys_addr_t arm_lpae_iova_to_phys(struct io_pgtable_ops *ops,
> >
> >               /* Valid entry? */
> >               if (!pte)
> > -                     return 0;
> > +                     return -EFAULT;
>
> Same here (and at the end of the function).
>
> > +
> > +             ret = cb(cb_data, &pte, lvl);
>
> Since pte is on the stack, rather than pointing into the actual pgtable,
> I think it would be clearer to pass it by value to the callback.
>
> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     return ret;
> >
> > -             /* Leaf entry? */
> > +             /* Leaf entry?  If so, we've found the translation */
> >               if (iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, data->iop.fmt))
> > -                     goto found_translation;
> > +                     return 0;
> >
> >               /* Take it to the next level */
> >               ptep = iopte_deref(pte, data);
> >       } while (++lvl < ARM_LPAE_MAX_LEVELS);
> >
> >       /* Ran out of page tables to walk */
> > +     return -EFAULT;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct iova_to_phys_walk_data {
> > +     arm_lpae_iopte pte;
> > +     int level;
> > +};
>
> Expanding a little on Robin's suggestion, why don't we drop this structure
> in favour of something more generic:
>
>         struct arm_lpae_walk_data {
>                 arm_lpae_iopte ptes[ARM_LPAE_MAX_LEVELS];
>         };
>
> and then do something in the walker like:
>
>         if (cb && !cb(pte, lvl))
>                 walk_data->ptes[lvl] = pte;
>

So thinking about this some more... if I use a walk_data struct to
return the PTEs, I can just get rid of the callback entirely.  That
ends up looking more like my first version.   The callback taking
void* was mainly to avoid coding the PTE size in the generic
io_pgtable interface.  But if we just go with u64, because that is the
biggest PTE size we need to deal with, then it all gets simpler.  (The
callback was actually a semi-awkward interface to use from drm/msm.)

BR,
-R

> which could return the physical address at the end, if it reaches a leaf
> entry. That way arm_lpae_iova_to_phys() is just passing a NULL callback
> to the walker and your debug callback just needs to return 0 (i.e. the
> callback is basically just saying whether or not to continue the walk).
>
> Will




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux