On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 05:49:54PM GMT, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 06:05:33PM GMT, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 18:02, Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 08:40:12AM GMT, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > > On HDMI connectors which use drm_bridge_connector and DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HDMI > > > > IGT chokes on the max_bpc property in several kms_properties tests due > > > > to the the drm_bridge_connector failing to reset HDMI-related > > > > properties. > > > > > > > > Call __drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_reset() if there is a > > > > the drm_bridge_connector has bridge_hdmi. > > > > > > > > Note, the __drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_reset() is moved to > > > > drm_atomic_state_helper.c because drm_bridge_connector.c can not depend > > > > on DRM_DISPLAY_HDMI_STATE_HELPER. At the same time it is impossible to > > > > call this function from HDMI bridges, there is is no function that > > > > corresponds to the drm_connector_funcs::reset(). > > > > > > Why can't it depend on DRM_DISPLAY_HDMI_STATE_HELPER? > > > > Is it okay to have DRM_KMS_HELPER to depend unconditionally or select > > DRM_DISPLAY_HDMI_STATE_HELPER? > > No, but it's not clear to me why drm_bridge_connector is part of > DRM_KMS_HELPER? It doesn't seem to be called from the core but only > drivers, just like DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE which has a separate config option But then DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE is also linked into drm_kms_helper.ko. I can't really say that I understand the definition of various helper modules, but my taste tells me that code from drm/*.c should not depend directly on the code from drm/display/*.c. -- With best wishes Dmitry
