On 04/06/2024 13:39, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > MediaTek MT8188 has a Mali-G57 MC3 (Valhall-JM): add a new > compatible and platform data using the same supplies and the > same power domain lists as MT8183 (one regulator, three power > domains). > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c > index ef9f6c0716d5..4e2d9f671a0d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c > @@ -777,6 +777,14 @@ static const struct panfrost_compatible mediatek_mt8186_data = { > .pm_features = BIT(GPU_PM_CLK_DIS) | BIT(GPU_PM_VREG_OFF), > }; > > +static const struct panfrost_compatible mediatek_mt8188_data = { > + .num_supplies = ARRAY_SIZE(mediatek_mt8183_b_supplies) - 1, > + .supply_names = mediatek_mt8183_b_supplies, I think this is a little confusing. Ideally we'd drop the existing mediatek_xxx_supplies which are the same as default_supplies and just use that instead. > + .num_pm_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(mediatek_mt8183_pm_domains), > + .pm_domain_names = mediatek_mt8183_pm_domains, We'd want at least a comment explaining that this isn't a typo (i.e. /* mt8188 uses the same pm domains as mt8183 */). But I'm also wondering if it would be sensible to simply have one domain list, something like: --->8--- static const char * const mediatek_pm_domains[] = { "core0", "core1", "core2", "core3", "core4" }; static const struct panfrost_compatible mediatek_mt8183_data = { ... .num_pm_domains = 3, .pm_domain_names = mediatek_pm_domains, }; ... static const struct panfrost_compatible mediatek_mt8186_data = { ... .num_pm_domains = 2, .pm_domain_names = mediatek_pm_domains, }; ... static const struct panfrost_compatible mediatek_mt8188_data = { ... .num_pm_domains = 3, .pm_domain_names = mediatek_pm_domains, }; ... static const struct panfrost_compatible mediatek_mt8192_data = { ... .num_pm_domains = 5, .pm_domain_names = mediatek_pm_domains, }; --->8--- OTOH what you've got it no worse than what we already had, so it's up to you whether you want to tidy this up or just add a comment so it doesn't look like there's a typo. Steve > + .pm_features = BIT(GPU_PM_CLK_DIS) | BIT(GPU_PM_VREG_OFF), > +}; > + > static const char * const mediatek_mt8192_supplies[] = { "mali", NULL }; > static const char * const mediatek_mt8192_pm_domains[] = { "core0", "core1", "core2", > "core3", "core4" }; > @@ -808,6 +816,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dt_match[] = { > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-mali", .data = &mediatek_mt8183_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183b-mali", .data = &mediatek_mt8183_b_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-mali", .data = &mediatek_mt8186_data }, > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-mali", .data = &mediatek_mt8188_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-mali", .data = &mediatek_mt8192_data }, > {} > };