On Wednesday 21 August 2013 02:24:01 Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday 16 August 2013 14:57:07 Pali Rohár wrote: > >> In commit 77145f1cbdf8d28b46ff8070ca749bad821e0774 was > >> introduced error which cause that reclocking on nv40 not > >> working anymore. There is missing assigment of return value > >> from pll_calc to ret. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c index 3af5bcd..625f80d > >> 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c > >> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ nv40_calc_pll(struct drm_device *dev, > >> u32 reg, struct nvbios_pll *pll, if (clk < > >> pll->vco1.max_freq) > >> > >> pll->vco2.max_freq = 0; > >> > >> - pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef); > >> + ret = pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef); > >> > >> if (ret == 0) > >> > >> return -ERANGE; > > > > Hello, it is possible to include this patch in 3.11? > > Or it is too late now and need to wait for 3.12? > > I've picked up the patch and will submit it in my next > 3.11-fixes pull request. > > Thanks, > Ben. > Hello, now I see that patch is in 3.11, thanks! Ben, what do you think, can be this patch backported to older kernels? -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
