On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 16 August 2013 14:57:07 Pali Rohár wrote: >> In commit 77145f1cbdf8d28b46ff8070ca749bad821e0774 was >> introduced error which cause that reclocking on nv40 not >> working anymore. There is missing assigment of return value >> from pll_calc to ret. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c index 3af5bcd..625f80d >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv40_pm.c >> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ nv40_calc_pll(struct drm_device *dev, u32 >> reg, struct nvbios_pll *pll, if (clk < pll->vco1.max_freq) >> pll->vco2.max_freq = 0; >> >> - pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef); >> + ret = pclk->pll_calc(pclk, pll, clk, &coef); >> if (ret == 0) >> return -ERANGE; > > Hello, it is possible to include this patch in 3.11? > Or it is too late now and need to wait for 3.12? I've picked up the patch and will submit it in my next 3.11-fixes pull request. Thanks, Ben. > > -- > Pali Rohár > pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
