On Mon, 20 May 2024, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 2:01 AM Dmitry Baryshkov > <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 03:55:14PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > Prefer the struct drm_edid based functions for reading the EDID and >> > updating the connector. >> > >> > Simplify the flow by updating the EDID property when the EDID is read >> > instead of at .get_modes. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > --- >> >> The patch looks good to me, I'd like to hear an opinion from Doug (added >> to CC). >> >> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> What is the merge strategy for the series? Do you plan to pick up all >> the patches to drm-misc or should we pick up individual patches into >> driver trees? > > I'm not sure I have too much to add here aside from what you guys have > already talked about. I'm OK with: > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I assume you'll want to pick this up for msm instead of me merging to drm-misc. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
