Hi Chen Ni, On 5/28/24 05:08, Chen Ni wrote: > Add check for the return value of of_drm_get_panel_orientation() and > return the error if it fails in order to catch the error. > > Fixes: b27c0f6d208d ("drm/panel: sitronix-st7789v: add panel orientation support") > Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c > index 88e80fe98112..8b15e225bf37 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c > @@ -643,7 +643,9 @@ static int st7789v_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > if (ret) > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get backlight\n"); > > - of_drm_get_panel_orientation(spi->dev.of_node, &ctx->orientation); > + ret = of_drm_get_panel_orientation(spi->dev.of_node, &ctx->orientation); > + if (ret) > + return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, ret, "Failed to get orientation\n"); > > drm_panel_add(&ctx->panel); I was worried that this effectively makes "rotation" a required property (although it is not marked required in the bindings documentation) but it turns out that of_drm_get_panel_orientation handles a missing "rotation" property gracefully. Also, all other panel drivers I checked handle the of_drm_get_panel_orientation call as you suggested. Nice to see this becoming aligned. Reviewed-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks and best regards, Michael