Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: use mem_is_zero() instead of !memchr_inv(s, 0, n)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 May 2024, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 12:43 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Use the mem_is_zero() helper where possible.
>
> ...
>
>> -       if (memchr_inv(guid, 0, 16) == NULL) {
>> +       if (mem_is_zero(guid, 16)) {
>>                 tmp64 = get_jiffies_64();
>>                 memcpy(&guid[0], &tmp64, sizeof(u64));
>>                 memcpy(&guid[8], &tmp64, sizeof(u64));
>
> What is the type of guid? Shouldn't it be guid_t with the respective
> guid_is_null()

I can leave out these parts of the patch.

BR,
Jani.

>
> ...
>
>> -       if (memchr_inv(guid, 0, 16))
>> +       if (!mem_is_zero(guid, 16))
>>                 return true;
>
> Ditto.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux