On Sun, 26 May 2024, at 3:22 AM, Conor Dooley wrote: >> >> Thanks, I don't actually know the vendor, would it be acceptable to just use "wl"? > > You mean, "wl,355608-a8"? I did a wee bit of googling of the thing, and > yeah, there's nothing that a surface level search turns up for it - > other than they appeared to have a logo with a W in a circle... > I think if we genuinely do not know what the vendor is then we just > don't have a prefix. I was going to go with "wl,wl-355608-a8" as the whole string seems to be the product/serial code, but happy to just not have the vendor prefix as per my V1 if that's acceptable, seems pretty obscure as you've found. > >> >> + compatible = "wl_355608_a8"; > Not _s :) Noted, ta. Regards, Ryan
