On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:53:47PM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 1:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> > > [devarsht: Rebase to 6.9 and change license to GPL]
> >
> > I'm not sure that you may change license. It needs the author's confirmation.
>
> Checking, this is referring to the MODULE_LICENSE, which used to be
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> and is now
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> If checkpatch is suggesting that now, then changing it sounds good to me.
In this case I agree on the change as it's purely syntax and not semantic.
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v6:
> > > * Rebase to linux-next, change license to GPL as suggested by checkpatch.
> >
> > Note, checkpatch.pl is not false positives free. Be careful
> > with what it suggests.
> >
> > > +#include <kunit/test.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gcd.h>
> >
> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >
> > Do you know why this header is included?
>
> I think I had put it in the original before a lot of the work you did
> to split things out of kernel.h.
> I haven't had time to look apply this patch series locally yet, but
> I'd be pretty sure we can remove it without anything breaking.
Briefly looking at the code I even not sure it was needed before, but maybe
I missed something, in any case, please remove / replace it.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
