Hi Maxime,
Thank you for reviewing the patches.
On 16/05/24 13:40, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 09:00:45PM +0530, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>> Add support for mode_fixup for the tidss CRTC.
>>
>> Some bridges like the cdns-dsi consume the crtc_* timing parameters for
>> programming the blanking values. Allow for the normal timing parameters
>> to get copied to crtc_* timing params.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_crtc.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_crtc.c
>> index 94f8e3178df5..797ef53d9ad2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_crtc.c
>> @@ -309,12 +309,23 @@ enum drm_mode_status tidss_crtc_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> return dispc_vp_mode_valid(tidss->dispc, tcrtc->hw_videoport, mode);
>> }
>>
>> +static
>> +bool tidss_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
>> +{
>> + drm_mode_set_crtcinfo(adjusted_mode, 0);
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs tidss_crtc_helper_funcs = {
>> .atomic_check = tidss_crtc_atomic_check,
>> .atomic_flush = tidss_crtc_atomic_flush,
>> .atomic_enable = tidss_crtc_atomic_enable,
>> .atomic_disable = tidss_crtc_atomic_disable,
>>
>> + .mode_fixup = tidss_crtc_mode_fixup,
>> .mode_valid = tidss_crtc_mode_valid,
>> };
>
> mode_fixup is deprecated for atomic drivers, so the solution must be
> different there.
>
> It's also not clear to me how it could change anything there:
> drm_mode_set_crtcinfo with no flags will make crtc_* field exactly
> identical to their !crtc counterparts.
>
I checked the flag options. There isn't any flag required. The only
reason to add this call is because cdns-dsi strictly requires the crtc_*
fields to be populated during the bridge enable.
Secondly, if mode_fixup is deprecated, I think the crtc_atomic_check
would be the next best place to add this call.
Regards
Aradhya
