On 16/05/2024 08:43, cong yang wrote:
Hi:
If it is determined that a separately patch needs to be sent, then I
will remove this patch in V8 series?
Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 于2024年5月16日周四 05:28写道：
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:16 PM <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 15/05/2024 03:46, Cong Yang wrote:
DRM_PANEL_HIMAX_HX83102 is being split out from DRM_PANEL_BOE_TV101WUM_NL6.
Since the arm64 defconfig had the BOE panel driver enabled, let's also
enable the himax driver.
Signed-off-by: Cong Yang <yangcong5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 2c30d617e180..687c86ddaece 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BOE_TV101WUM_NL6=m
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_LVDS=m
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=m
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_EDP=m
+CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_HIMAX_HX83102=m
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_ILITEK_ILI9882T=m
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_MANTIX_MLAF057WE51=m
CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_RAYDIUM_RM67191=m
You should probably sent this one separately since only an ARM SoC maintainer
can apply this, probably via the qcom tree.
Really? I always kinda figured that this was a bit like MAINTAINERS
where it can come through a bunch of different trees. Certainly I've
landed changes to it before through the drm-misc tree. If that was
wrong then I'll certainly stop doing it, of course.
Yeah we usually don't mess with arch specific defconfig from drm tree
-Doug
