Re: [PATCH] drm: deprecate driver date

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, April 29th, 2024 at 18:43, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The driver date serves no useful purpose, because it's hardly ever
> updated. The information is misleading at best.
> 
> As described in Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst:
> 
> The driver date, formatted as YYYYMMDD, is meant to identify the date
> of the latest modification to the driver. However, as most drivers
> fail to update it, its value is mostly useless. The DRM core prints it
> to the kernel log at initialization time and passes it to userspace
> through the DRM_IOCTL_VERSION ioctl.
> 
> Stop printing the driver date at init, and start returning the empty
> string "" as driver date through the DRM_IOCTL_VERSION ioctl.

Sounds good to me.

Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx>

BTW, I wonder if the driver version number (major/minor/patch) is useful?
Do drivers update it?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux