Hi, On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:43:18AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > On 2024/4/26 03:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:08:16AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > > > On 2024/4/25 22:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > It seems driver missed the point of proper use of device property APIs. > > > > Correct this by updating headers and calls respectively. > > > You are using the 'seems' here exactly saying that you are not 100% sure. > > > > > > Please allow me to tell you the truth: This patch again has ZERO effect. > > > It fix nothing. And this patch is has the risks to be wrong. > > Huh?! Really, stop commenting the stuff you do not understand. > > I'm actually a professional display drivers developer at the downstream > in the past, despite my contribution to upstream is less. But I believe > that all panel driver developers know what I'm talking about. So please > have take a look at my replies. Most of the interactions you had in this series has been uncalled for. You might be against a patch, but there's no need to go to such length. As far as I'm concerned, this patch is fine to me in itself, and I don't see anything that would prevent us from merging it. Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
