Hi,
On 2024/4/26 03:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:53:22AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2024/4/26 02:08, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Are you speaking to yourself? I'm totally lost.
Please, if you want to give a constructive feedback, try to understand
the topic from different aspects and then clearly express it.
OK,
The previous email analysis the non-DT cases exhaustively, this email intend to
demonstrate the more frequently use case.
That is, in the *DT('OF')* based systems,
device_get_match_data() is completely equivalent to
of_device_get_match_data().
So the net results of applying this patch are "no gains and no lost".
Things will become clear if we divide the whole problem into two cases(DT and non-DT)
to discuss, that's it. That's all I can tell.
Sorry about my broken written and sorry for the noise. Thanks for your education in
the past.
--
Best regards,
Sui
