On 19/04/24 14:41, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:28:23PM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>> In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to
>> release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct
>> drm_device.
>>
>> v2: Directly expose the original function, instead of introducing a
>> helper (Rodrigo)
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellstr_m <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++
>> include/drm/drm_drv.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>> index 243cacb3575c..ba60cbb0725f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
>> @@ -714,6 +714,12 @@ static int devm_drm_dev_init(struct device *parent,
>> devm_drm_dev_init_release, dev);
>> }
>>
>> +void devm_drm_dev_release_action(struct drm_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + devm_release_action(dev->dev, devm_drm_dev_init_release, dev);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_drm_dev_release_action);
> Again, this needs to be documented.
sorry I missed your earlier email, will address this.
Thanks,
Aravind.
>
> Maxime
