Re: [REBASE 7/7] drm/edid: make drm_edid_are_equal() more convenient for its single user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 16.04.24 um 14:27 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 16.04.24 um 11:20 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>>> Repurpose drm_edid_are_equal() to be more helpful for its single user,
>>>> and rename drm_edid_eq(). Functionally deduce the length from the blob
>>>> size, not the blob data, making it more robust against any errors.
>>> Could be squashed into patch 6.
>> Ack.
>>
>> Thanks for the review. I'll hold of on resending these until there are
>> some R-b's... I've send them a few times already with no comments. :(
>
> Feel free to add
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
>
> to the series.

Many thanks! Just to double check, do you want me to move patch 5
earlier and squash patches 6&7?

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux