Hi Tvrtko,
On 4/1/24 10:21, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 01/04/2024 13:45, Christian König wrote:
Am 01.04.24 um 14:39 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
On 29/03/2024 00:00, T.J. Mercier wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:53 AM Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
There is no point in compiling in the list and mutex operations
which are
only used from the dma-buf debugfs code, if debugfs is not compiled
in.
Put the code in questions behind some kconfig guards and so save
some text
and maybe even a pointer per object at runtime when not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
How would patches to dma-buf be typically landed? Via what tree I
mean? drm-misc-next?
That should go through drm-misc-next.
And feel free to add Reviewed-by: Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> as well.
Thanks!
Maarten if I got it right you are handling the next drm-misc-next pull -
could you merge this one please?
Applied to drm-misc/drm-misc-next!
Best Regards,
- Maíra
Regards,
Tvrtko
