Hi Thomas, Could you share your thoughts on this please. Thanks, Aravind. On 02/04/24 14:28, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote: > In scenarios where drm_dev_put is directly called by driver we want to > release devm_drm_dev_init_release action associated with struct > drm_device. > > v2: Directly expose the original function, instead of introducing a > helper (Rodrigo) > > Cc: Thomas Hellstr_m <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++ > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > index 243cacb3575c..ba60cbb0725f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c > @@ -714,6 +714,12 @@ static int devm_drm_dev_init(struct device *parent, > devm_drm_dev_init_release, dev); > } > > +void devm_drm_dev_release_action(struct drm_device *dev) > +{ > + devm_release_action(dev->dev, devm_drm_dev_init_release, dev); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_drm_dev_release_action); > + > void *__devm_drm_dev_alloc(struct device *parent, > const struct drm_driver *driver, > size_t size, size_t offset) > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h > index 8878260d7529..fa9123684874 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h > @@ -444,6 +444,8 @@ struct drm_driver { > const struct file_operations *fops; > }; > > +void devm_drm_dev_release_action(struct drm_device *dev); > + > void *__devm_drm_dev_alloc(struct device *parent, > const struct drm_driver *driver, > size_t size, size_t offset);