On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 29/03/2024 11:27, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Depends on the first patch.
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c | 1 -
> >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
> >> index fcc5e8c08973..9fae8e396c58 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
> >> @@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_gpio_driver = {
> >> .remove = virtio_gpio_remove,
> >> .driver = {
> >> .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> >> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >> },
> >> };
> >> module_virtio_driver(virtio_gpio_driver);
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
>
> I expressed dependency in two places: cover letter and this patch.
> Please drop it, because without dependency this won't work. Patch could
> go with the dependency and with your ack or next cycle.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Dropped, and:
Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
